Thanks to a new mathematical tool created by researchers from James Cook  University and the University of Adelaide, the wombat has been classified  as not worth saving. Co-author of the safe index Professor Corey  Bradshaw says he doesn't think people should give up on saving extremely  endangered animals but adds, "...if you take a strictly empirical view,  things that are well below in numbering in theHTML clipboard
 hundreds - white-footed  rock rats, certain types of hare wallabies, a lot of the smaller mammals  that have been really nailed by the feral predators like cats, and  foxes - in some cases it is probably not worthwhile putting a lot of  effort because there's just no chance."
He says the index is based on the probability of a species becoming  extinct.
 "If we have something that has a very poor safe index, we would just  simply say that it has a higher probability of going extinct rather than  something with a higher safe index," he said.
 "It is a probability, so it is not saying it will go extinct. It is  saying it just has a much higher probability of going extinct."
 He says the index is likely to generate debate.
 "Decisions have to be made within the context of science and social  consideration.
 "I think that certainly people will argue with me that we should save  everything.
 "I'd love to save everything. I just don't think we can."
 - ABC News