"If you cut trees in the boreal region, north of 45 degrees latitude, you have a net cooling effect," said Xuhui Lee, the study's principal investigator and professor of meteorology at the Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies. "You release carbon into the atmosphere by cutting down trees, but you increase the albedo effect—the reflection of sunlight."
Lee and a team of researchers from 20 other institutions found that surface temperatures in open areas were cooler because snow cover reflected the sun's rays back into outer space, while nearby forested areas absorbed the sun's heat. At night, without the albedo effect, open land continued to cool faster than forests, which force warm turbulent air from aloft to the ground.
"People are debating whether afforestation is a good idea in high latitudes," said Lee. "If you plant trees you sequester carbon, which is a benefit to the climate system. At the same time, if you plant trees you warm the landscape because trees are darker compared to other vegetation types. So they absorb solar radiation."
The researchers calculated that north of Minnesota, or 45 degrees latitude, the temperature decreased by an average of 1.5 degrees Fahrenheit. On the other hand, deforestation south of North Carolina, or 35 degrees latitude, appeared to cause warming. In addition, Lee said that "statistically insignificant" cooling occurred between these two latitudes.
The researchers collected temperature data from a network of weather stations in forests from Florida to Manitoba and compared results with nearby stations situated in open grassy areas that were used as a proxy for deforested land.
"The cooling effect is linear with latitude, so the farther north you go the cooler you get with deforestation," said Lee.
