But, certain plastics in food, buildings and disposable consumer products are not just toxic and dangerous (to people and the planet) but also deplete the finite limit to the same "vital" plastics that are essential to our future.
IF plastics were regulated on a "risk scale of sustainable use"... "problem plastics", currently contributing to our toxic disposable cocktail of consumer use products, would be diverted to building a safer, healthier and more sustainable future. As qualitive "risk based" law would regulate how and why plastics are safely used.
Between the EPA,CPSC, international non-profit, environmental and plastics groups... this information language is ALREADY well defined and documented. So putting it into law should be easy enough?
But hey, "What do I know" ;-)
... here are the toxic "plastic problems" summary by reader request.
![](http://www.christopherhaase.com/blog/uploaded_images/collage-771894.jpg)
Regardless the 'Toxic' plastic could remain in use. As speculation mounts that the federal government will declare that common plastic food and drink containers are officially toxic, an odd twist is also emerging: Being declared toxic would not force the products off supermarket shelves
- Chemical in plastic packaging may harm baby growth.
"Chemical in Plastic May Harm Human Growth" - Canada Says Good Bye - Hazardous Chemicals
- BPA scandal - Public health agency linked to chemical industry
- Professor-obesity could be caused by female sex hormones used to make plastic bottles
Online resources on possible risks and alternatives to plastics for children:
- Environment California report: sfgate.com/ZCM
- EWG report on bisphenol A: ewg.org