Showing posts with label Peakonomics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Peakonomics. Show all posts

Apr 23, 2010

Peak Phosphorus - Peakonomics 101

From Kansas to China, farmers treat their fields with phosphorus-rich fertilizer to increase the yield of their crops...

Our dwindling supply of phosphorus, a primary component underlying the growth of global agricultural production, threatens to disrupt food security across the planet during the coming century. 

This is the gravest natural resource shortage you've never heard of.

Apr 19, 2010

Kohler Flush with ideas and water saving products

Water-saving toilets: designs have improved and "there's no trade-off now," said Shane Judd, product manger for water conservation at the Kohler Co.

"They're more efficient in terms of using less water and performing better than their 1.6-gallon counterparts."

Just installing a high-efficiency toilet, faucet and shower head can save an average family of four 39,000 gallons of water a year, compared with models considered the industry standard.
With all the attention on rising energy bills, there's been a big focus on energy-efficient appliances, but that hasn't always translated over to the water side.

"People just don't think about how much water they flush in their toilet. It's not top of mind," Judd said.

"When you tell somebody that 25% of the water that's consumed for indoor use is flushed down the toilet, they start to connect the dots" and see not only water savings but cost savings over time.

In the past few years, Kohler Co. has moved to green up its product line and now boasts that nearly every model of faucet it produces is water-saving, earning the Environmental Protection Agency WaterSense label.


Focusing on a sustainable future...
The company is embracing what Johnson Controls Inc., Kohl's Corp. and other companies have dubbed the "triple bottom line" - balancing economic, environmental and social factors in strategizing for the future.

"Our fundamental premise was that it's really about the triple bottom line - the economic, environmental and social aspect - and how can we develop a strategy, because at the end of the day we're still about business, still about growth and still about advancing this company, but in a sustainable fashion," Judd said.

....The company has revamped its product design process so that "everything takes place through the lens of sustainability," Judd said.

Case in point: the dual-flush toilet with no handle. Pick one button for "number one" and just 0.8 gallons of water will flush. Button number two flushes away a more significant amount of waste with 1.6 gallons of water.

"The design is very contemporary and easy to clean, so it allows consumers to install a product that has beautiful design but also conserves water," Judd said.

Education campaign
Kohler's new green push extends beyond its factories and products to a national education campaign designed to educate Americans about water scarcity.

"Thirty six states will face water shortages by 2013,"
Kohler warns on its www.savewateramerica.com Web site, the host site for its awareness campaign.




---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Haase:   While reducing consumer use is vital, reducing commercial and industrial water waste is critical.

Kohlers LEED Waterless urinals could also revolutionize water savings in large scale applications reducing "40,000 gallons of water per fixture per year" in typical commercial installations.



Apr 17, 2010

Idle Livestock on Treadmill to Generate Electricity For Farms

A small farm could earn back a 50-cow system's estimated $100,000 price in three years.
ViA PopSciInstead of milling around aimlessly in pens, as most cows do, William Taylor's herd is put to work. As they eat, they walk on an electricity-generating treadmill. 

A small farm could earn back a 50-cow system's estimated $100,000 price in three years.

Taylor has invented, among other contraptions, a better manure mixer and a pen that prevents cows from kicking vets during medical procedures on his farm in Northern Ireland.
But this was his first foray into making power. Cows walk as many as eight hours a day while grazing, and one day Taylor realized that he could turn that free motion into electricity. On his Livestock Power Mill, a cow stands on a nonpowered inclined belt that the animal will slowly slide down unless it walks forward, turning the belt, which spins a gearbox to drive a generator. A feed box entices the cow to keep trekking. The one-cow prototype generates up to two kilowatts, enough to power four milking machines. 

Some studies suggest that cows that exercise make more milk, so Taylor plans to study the system's health benefits this fall. As a bonus, he speculates that it might cut cattle's methane problem-cows burp up to 20 percent of the world's emissions of this powerful greenhouse gas. Humans, he notes, tend to be more gassy if they lounge around. "Helping cows produce less methane while cranking out energy should get them better PR."

Sep 13, 2009

Relying on Offsets can Lead to Climate Disaster

Source:

The controversial practice of carbon offsetting, via which U.S. polluters send money overseas in exchange for promised—and often pretend—pollution reductions elsewhere, came under fire today in a new report published by Friends of the Earth.

Offsets are a centerpiece of the energy bill that passed the House of Representatives in June, and they may be included in soon-to-be-introduced legislation in the Senate. The report explains how offsets work and concludes that they are a flawed approach to combating global warming. A Dangerous Distraction: Why Offsets Are a Mistake the U.S. Cannot Afford to Make



Read full from Shirl Kennedy @ DocuTicker

Mar 12, 2009

The BIG and beautiful - Water Quality Investment Act of 2009

Yep, here it is: H.R. 1262

National water quality protection as a 'pay-as-you-go'
CBO estimates that implementing this legislation effects on direct spending and revenues over the 2009-2013 and 2009-2018 periods are relevant for enforcing pay-as-you-go rules under the current budget resolution. CBO estimates that enacting this legislation would reduce revenues by about $36 million over that five-year period and by $547 million over the 2009-2018 period. Enacting the bill also would reduce direct spending by about $266 million over the 2009-2013 period and about $625 million over the 2009-2018 period. Together, those changes would yield net pay-as-you-go savings of $230 million over five years and about $78 million over 10 years.

H.R. 1262 contains several intergovernmental mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA), including monitoring, reporting, and public notification requirements for publicly owned treatment systems. The bill also includes an additional reporting requirement for states. CBO estimates that the annual cost of complying with those mandates would likely exceed the threshold established in UMRA ($69 million for intergovernmental mandates in 2009, adjusted annually for inflation).

Spending Subject to Appropriation
This legislation would authorize appropriations totaling about $18.7 billion over the next five years for EPA’s water infrastructure and grant programs. Amounts authorized to be appropriated for individual programs are shown in Table 2.



ESTIMATED IMPACT ON STATE, LOCAL, AND TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS
H.R. 1262 would require treatment plants to comply with a number of new requirements. Those requirements are not conditions of federal assistance, and consequently, they would be intergovernmental mandates as defined in UMRA. Specifically, the bill would require:
  • Institute and utilize a monitoring program for sewer overflows, including combined sewer overflows and sanitary sewer overflows;
  • Notify the public of a sewer overflow within 24 hours;
  • Notify public health authorities and other affected entities, such as public water systems, if there is an imminent and substantial risk to human health due to a sewer overflow;
  • Provide a report of an overflow within 24 hours to the state or to the Administrator of EPA;
  • Report each sewer overflow on its monthly discharge monitoring report to EPA or the treatment plant’s state. This report must include the magnitude, cause, and mitigation efforts for the specific overflows; and
  • Submit an annual report to EPA or the state on the number of overflows in a calendar year, including the details of magnitude, duration, location, potentially affected receiving waters, and mitigation efforts.
If a state receives a report under this requirement, that state must submit to EPA a summary of the report.

Read full at cbo.gov

Feb 7, 2009

FACT most sustainable power is unsustainable... ouch

HARD NOSE FACT - Renewable energy needs to become a lot more renewable –

This reality  emerged at the Financial Times Energy Conference in London this week.

Although scientists are agreed that we must cut carbon emissions from transport and electricity generation to prevent the globe's climate becoming hotter, and more unpredictable, the most advanced "renewable" technologies are too often based upon non-renewable resources, attendees heard.

Read more here via newscientist.com (Original link from the theoildrum)

New biomass charcoal heater: A 'new era' of efficiency and sustainability

WASHINGTON, Feb. 5, 2009 — Millions of homes in rural areas of Far Eastern countries are heated by charcoal burned on small, hibachi-style portable grills. Scientists in Japan are now reporting development of an improved "biomass charcoal combustion heater" that they say could open a new era in sustainable and ultra-high efficiency home heating.

Their study was published in ACS' Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, a bi-weekly journal.

In the study, Amit Suri, Masayuki Horio and colleagues note that about 67 percent of Japan is covered with forests, with that biomass the nation's most abundant renewable energy source. Wider use of biomass could tap that sustainable source of fuel and by their calculations cut annual carbon dioxide emissions by 4.46 million tons.

Using waste biomass charcoal, their heater recorded a thermal efficiency of 60-81 percent, compared to an efficiency of 46-54 percent of current biomass stoves in Turkey and the U.S.

"The charcoal combustion heater developed in the present work, with its fast startup, high efficiency, and possible automated control, would open a new era of massive but small-scale biomass utilization for a sustainable society," the authors say.

*The research in this press release is from a copyrighted publication, and stories must credit the journal by name or the American Chemical Society.  News media may obtain a full text of this report ("Development of Biomass Charcoal Combustion Heater for Household Utilization") in ACS' Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research by downloading the full text article at http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/ie8006243.

Link source the oildrum HT

Feb 5, 2009

Biogas network could meet half domestic heating needs

UK's various waste streams could produce enough biogas to heat half the homes in the country, according to new research commissioned by National Grid.
 
The study, which was undertaken by Ernst & Young, concluded that biodegradable waste streams such as sewage, animal manure, food and wood could be harnessed relatively easily to generate biomethane that could be connected to the existing gas network.
 
It said that a UK-wide biogas network could be developed at a cost of around £10bn – a price tag the report claims is competitive with other forms of renewable energy such as wind power even before considering the higher infrastructure costs associated with connecting those other forms of renewables to the electricity grid.
 
Janine Freeman, head of National Grid’s Sustainable Gas Group, said that biogas had the potential to act as something of a silver bullet solution, simultaneously cutting methane and carbon emissions, boosting renewable energy capacity and providing a domestic replacement to waning North Sea gas reserves.
 
"Biogas has benefits on so many fronts," she argued. "It is renewable and could help to meet the target of 15 per cent of all our energy coming from renewable sources by 2020. It provides a solution for what to do with our waste with the decline in landfill capacity and it would help the UK with a secure supply of gas as North Sea sources run down."
 
The report also concluded that the two main approaches for producing biogas - anaerobic digestion which turns wet waste such as sewage into biomethane, and thermal gasification of dry waste such as waste wood or energy crops - are technically proven and offer a more efficient alternative to current small-scale projects to use landfill waste to generate electricity.
 
It argues that the only barrier to wider adoption of biogas technologies is the fact that the sector has not received the same level of government support as more established renewables sources. It also calls for an immediate overhaul of renewable heat policy.
 
Freeman said that biogas' "tremendous potential" would only be realised if the government commits to "a comprehensive waste policy and the right commercial incentives".
 
In particular, the report recommends the government develops a waste management policy to ensure each waste stream is directed to the appropriate biogas technology. It also calls for a new incentive scheme to encourage renewable gas producers to grid-inject their gas rather than generate electricity from it, as they are currently incentivised to do under the government's Renewables Obligation scheme.
 
A spokesman for the Department for Energy and Climate Change said that the government was already committed to recovering greater levels of energy from waste streams, adding that "further work is taking place in the context of our Renewable Energy Strategy to establish what potential might exist for biogas injection to the gas grid".
 

Jan 23, 2009

Peak Oil, Gas, Coal and Uranium... Peak prosperity?

Much Awesomeness From BigGAV
 
One of the biggest energy conference in the world that is being attended by key policy makers, financiers, leading academics and no less than 400 journalists from all over the world opened with a prince who spoke about the lessons that we need to learn from the collapse of historic civilizations in perspective to the four peaks of oil, gas, coal and uranium that await us.
From  A Prince and Four Peaks: Peak Oil, Gas, Coal and Uranium speech:
Ladies and gentlemen, did you know that when the Roman Empire finally collapsed, large parts of Europe had been deforested. Acres of forestland had been cleared for farmland and to provide firewood. Wood and food were essential, to maintain the Roman Empire. To meet their short term needs, the Romans overexploited their prime energy resource. They did not think about the consequences for later generations. So the demise of a seemingly invincible civilization was partially due to the unsustainable use of their prime energy resource. The question is, are we going to be any wiser?

What the Romans were experiencing, we would now describe as peak wood. Reaching a point of maximum production after which it enters terminal decline. We are now facing a century of at least four undesirable peaks, peak oil, peak gas, peak coal and peak uranium. Mountaineers may be proud to conquer peaks, but there is no reason whatsoever for us to be proud. We can, however, change the course of history. The technologies we need are there.

On a global level, the sun and the deserts present us with major opportunity. We know all energy resources originate from one source, one masdar, nuclear fusion from the surface of the sun. Arab traders sailed the Indian Ocean, long before Europeans ventured into these regions. The same winds Columbus used were there, generated by the sun's heat to make his historic journeys. My wife and I traveled to this beautiful city by plane, with fossil energy generated millions of years ago by that same sun. If it were up to the sun we would have no energy problems at all. Every 30 minutes the earth absorbs enough light to meet the energy needs for one year. Every 30 minutes, if only we could harvest it. To do so we need the world's deserts. Many regard deserts as a barren and hostile environment. In fact, they are a precious source of life, which we should embrace and protect for the common good.

The point is, if we don’t treat energy as a long term investment, we will end up paying much higher bills. But we mustn’t wait until solar energy plants and cross border grids are available for sustainable energy supplies. We need to invest at the local level too. Technologies for local production of sustainable energy are readily available for both electricity and local cooling. These technologies can be applied without a large infrastructure, making them more promising than existing examples. There are three examples I would like to share with you today, two designed in the Netherlands and a third a joint venture between Canadian and Spanish scientists and entrepreneurs.

The first is the green greenhouse, a new generation of greenhouses that produces not only plants and food but also clean electricity, heating and cooling. One transformed, greenhouse can provide sufficient energy for 200 homes. The green greenhouses produce biogas for electricity generation and uses the CO2 thus generated to stimulate the growth of plants. This process also produces water of drinking quality.

The second example is vacuum sewerage for toilet and kitchen disposal. The sewage is used locally for the production of biogas. The pipelines are only half the size of the normal pipelines, giving higher flexibility for construction. Both CO2 emissions and water use are reduced by 50%. No larger infrastructure is required and developing regions are presented with the opportunity to obtain much better water conditions.

The third example is the production of clean energy by a new, completely closed system of garbage gasification in small units. 99.8% of the total garbage supply is re-used or converted, producing 80% more biogas then it uses. No water is wasted during the process. On the contrary, water is one of the products.

What makes all these technologies interesting is that they contribute to the solution of the energy problem and also help in other areas. They help us reduce water scarcity and get rid of excess waste, and present new economic opportunities in developing regions. Contrary to general belief, they are no more costly than the traditional polluting production processes. In fact, they result in substantial savings. The payback time, in green greenhouses for example, is only three years.

So, ladies and gentleman, we know the technologies are there, for both global and local solutions. We need the political will and the right approach to investment for a fundamental transition toward a new energy system. We owe it to our children and to future generations. Investments in sustainable solutions make our communities healthier, our planet cleaner, our economy stronger, and our future brighter.

Let us look beyond the current financial and economic crisis and build the foundations of a sustainable future. As a result of this crisis, billions of dollars of public spending are needed to build better economies and generate economic growth. If we spend wisely in sustainable solutions, these investments will also contribute towards rescuing our planet.
 
Read full from the BigGAV

Mar 31, 2008

Biochar Answer for Healthy Soil and Carbon Sequestration

Biochar is mostly inert, and is known to stay in the soil for thousands of years. It is also not subjected to the risk of being blown down in a hurricane, or cut down, or otherwise placed in a process for a more rapid return of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere.

As a sequestration technology, biochar is simple, easy, and proven. Although sequestration alone might be enough of a reason to consider biochar, the benefits of biochar in agriculture are really the reason this solution is gaining momentum quickly. The use of biochar has been shown to increase water retention, microbial activity, uptake of minerals by plants, as well as continued deposition of healthy soil. Two new organizations have emerged that highlight the multi-faceted solution of biochar.

IBI_logo.jpg

 

The International Biochar Initiative (IBI) has emerged as the center for biochar research and development. The IBI:

"Provides a platform for the international exchange of information and activities in support of biochar research, development, demonstration and commercialization. It advocates biochar as a strategy to:

* improve the Earth's soils;
* help mitigate the anthropogenic greenhouse effect by reducing greenhouse gas emissions and sequestering atmospheric carbon in a stable soil carbon pool; and
* improve water quality by retaining agrochemicals.

The IBI also promotes:

*sustainable co-production of clean energy and other bio-based products as part of the biochar process;
* efficient biomass utilization in developing country agriculture; and
* cost-effective utilization of urban, agricultural and forest co products."

Biochar begins to answer problems surrounding biodiversity, water purity, deforestation, hunger, and poverty. As we recognize the 'services' healthy soil can provide biochar continues to gain value as a strategy to mitigate many of these issues at the same time.

Read more at treehugger

Mar 23, 2008

Microreactor can convert virtually any liquid fuel into hydrogen,

Hydrogen car problem: While hydrogen has been lauded as the "energy of the future," this is NOT a short term reality.... Hydrogen is not a great energy carrier. It has a relatively low energy density, it's difficult and dangerous to transport, and finding a way to store it in vehicles has proven difficult (ranges of only 100 miles). The refueling infrastructure is also non-existent.

Even more to the point, we haven't yet established a renewable source of energy to produce hydrogen.

Possible solution: Weighing less than one pound, the square piece of shiny steel houses an array of microchannels containing patented catalytic sites. Each microtube helps convert a continuous stream of hydrogen from fuels like gasoline, diesel, vegetable oil, biodiesel, propane, natural gas, even the glycerol byproduct from biodiesel manufacturing.

Reducing the cost of hydrogen generation: "The smaller system size, reduced catalyst volume, and more efficient process that is realized with InnovaTek's technology represents another significant step in moving the hydrogen economy from science to commercial reality," he said. 

While InnovTtek's reactor can run on a variety of non-renewable hydrocarbon sources they, like the potentially revolutionary Coskata Biofuels, are expressly interested in sustainable power, even to the point of preferring biodiesel in their test runs. Innovatek also said that biodiesel just plain works better: it contains fewer impurities and reforms at lower temperatures than petrodiesel.

Taking all this into consideration, Innovatek's reactor could revolutionize the energy and transportation infrastructure of the country.

Source gas2.org

Find out more about hydrogen fuel problems and solutions at: HybridHype

Jan 25, 2008

California has taken a wrong turn in reducing greenhouse gases by allowing corn-based ethanol into vehicle gas tanks

And the profits and Tax money are booming from it!

While California is heralded as a world leader in addressing climate change, An analysis by O'Hare and Alexander Farrell, U.C. Berkeley professor of energy and resources, showed that on account of land-use changes stimulated by greater use of ethanol in motor fuel, "the carbon intensity of California's gasoline" already has risen between 3 percent and 33 percent.

Ethanol can be expected to add more global warming gases in the years ahead as the percentage of ethanol in gasoline climbs, according to scientists.

The analysis comes after California lifted the cap on the ethanol content of gasoline from 6 percent to 10 percent last year in preparation for a low carbon fuel standard. The strategy is aimed at cutting the carbon intensity of motor fuel by 10 percent by 2020.

"All the numbers we've seen so far go the wrong way," said Michael O'Hare, U.C. Berkeley professor of public policy. "It looks like these numbers are pretty big."

"There are things that happen that you can't see," he said.

In a January 12 memorandum to the Air Board outlining their findings, O'Hare and Farrell wrote that shifting one acre of farmland from food production to growing corn for ethanol ripples throughout world agricultural markets. It can result in forest being cut down half way around the world for planting replacement corn for food. Then the forest no longer removes carbon from the atmosphere, but instead decays and releases carbon to the air.

"The analysis suggests that indirect greenhouse gas emissions are larger than direct [ones] due to the large amounts of carbon stored in ecosystems of all sorts," according to the analysis.

The miscalculation in part stems from the so-called GREET model, which the state relied on to make judgments about the life cycle carbon emissions attributable to various fuels, the analysis notes. That model does not account for indirect land-use changes when crops are turned into fuel. As a result, for instance, it underestimates the amount of carbon emissions caused when ethanol is made out of corn grown on conservation reserve program lands--usually fragile areas prone to soil erosion--by 155 times.

Nov 16, 2007

The Key to a Environmentally Sustainable and Happy Life

"The best years of your life are the ones in which you decide your problems are your own. You don't blame them on your mother, the ecology, or the President. You realize that you control your own destiny." Albert Ellis

Nov 5, 2007

Environmentally Preferable Purchasing team has redesigned EPA's EPP Web site!

 

Thanks Mark W. McElroy - sustainableinnovation.org

Nice map of "Global Warming Footprints" from www.sustainableinnovation.org

Stephen Hawking on Sustainability

Yikes - One of the smartest men does not think we can survive ourselves
...We cannot remain looking inward at ourselves on a small and increasingly polluted and overcrowded planet. We need to look outward to the wider universe. This will take time and effort, but it will become easier as our technology improves. I therefore want to encourage public interest in space. I have never let my condition stop me. You only live once.


Want to know more about Stephen William Hawking

Born on 8 January 1942 (300 years after the death of Galileo) in Oxford, England. Professor Hawking has twelve honorary degrees, was awarded the CBE in 1982, and was made a Companion of Honor in 1989. He is the recipient of many awards, medals and prizes and is a Fellow of The Royal Society and a Member of the US National Academy of Sciences. Stephen Hawking - Life in the Universe



Wal-Mart Lee Scott, "Sustainability is here to stay."

Lee Scott seems to think they can. Some excerpts from his remarks to the gathering of suppliers as well as executives from his own company:

Sustainability is here to stay. It is not a fad, it is not a marketing ploy. . . . It is in fact a part of what all of us are going to be doing with our businesses from here on out. It is not about higher margins and higher prices. It is about the elimination of waste. It is about making our businesses more effective. It is about transferring those benefits on to the consumer. And it is about taking chemicals and things we know aren't good for the environment and finding alternatives to those chemicals so we make products safer.

I think for Wal-Mart one of the key roles for sustainability is it is going to cause us to have better products. Because we're going to be thinking about the quality in those products: what is the defective rate  . . . what are the life-cycle costs of that product . . . . Ultimately my view is that because of sustainability, we also will be dealing with the best companies. Let me talk about sourcing from someone who is willing to compromise on the environment -- maybe destroy waste in an inappropriate way, or use chemicals that they shouldn't. What in the world would make Wal-Mart think that the person who is willing to compromise the environment, knowingly, wouldn't also be willing to compromise on quality to meet a price point? . . .

My belief is that we're going to find that sustainability and all of these social context issues are all related and all end up showing up in the quality of the products. And that as we use sustainability as a driving force, we will have better suppliers . . . and it will enhance the reputation that we have as a company.

High-minded words, to be sure. And they will likely rankle Wal-Mart's many detractors, for whom the words "Wal-Mart" and "sustainability," used together, are simply discordant. The doubters are not irrational. For years, Wal-Mart has been an aggressive, sometimes arrogant, leviathan, seemingly out of touch with progressive social and environmental ideas and ideals. In its single-minded pursuit for growth and dominance, it played rough -- with competitors, communities, suppliers, politicians, and anyone who got in its way, notably (or especially) activists. How can this sudden embrace of sustainability be anything other than a cynical ploy?

I'm pretty sure that it's not. In recent months, Wal-Mart has put itself out there in ways that few other companies have done. It is spreading the green gospel to its 1.3 million employees, teaching them how to live greener lives. It is inviting activists into its offices, and commanding suppliers to meet new, green goals, and parading its CEO in front of audiences and the press to talk the sustainability talk.

To the extent the cynics are right, it's that Wal-Mart's mission is to sell more stuff to more people in the pursuit of profitability and growth, an arguably unsustainable proposition. And that's a problem.

But along the way, the behemoth from Bentonville stands to move hundreds, perhaps thousands of suppliers toward a more sustainable path, and help to fuel consumer demand for things organic, nontoxic, and efficient, among other attributes. And, perhaps, engender everyday environmental habits among the citizenry in ways that even the most committed environmental activists have failed to do.

As Scott put it last week:

We have simply started. We make no claims of being a green company. We're not saying we're better than anyone, we're not saying we're doing it right. What we're saying is that we recognize an opportunity to make a difference in this world, make a difference for our customers, for our shareholders, for our associates, and it is worthwhile to do.

It's a messy affair, this sustainability thing. And Wal-Mart has made more than its share of the mess. But maybe, just maybe, that same company, in its dogged pursuit of productivity and profits, can create more than its share of the solution, too.

Oct 30, 2007

Wood Construction vs Deforestation

From treehugger.comprincemix.jpg quotes from Prince Charles- "The simple fact is that combating deforestation is likely to be one of the quickest and most cost-effective means of reducing carbon dioxide emissions" -"Wood can be the perfect sustainable material; it sucks up CO2 and once cut, it holds it for the life of the building." a reader writes: " I was going through the feed today and noticed a story that made me think about the other.

I don't believe that there is any contradiction here. HRH is talking about the burning of forests, particularly the rainforest, to clear land for agriculture (including palm oil plantations) or to use as fuel. There is also rainforest habitat loss due to illegal logging of exotic woods for architectural uses.

The architecture and construction we show on TreeHugger (and the wood construction we promote) is built from sustainably harvested forests, usually close to the location of construction. Our favorite woods are certified by the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC)  who say  "In many forests around the world, logging still contributes to habitat destruction, water pollution, displacement of indigenous peoples, and violence against people who work in the forest and the wildlife that dwells there. Many consumers of wood and paper, and many forest products companies believe that the link between logging and these negative impacts can be broken, and that forests can be managed and protected at the same time. Forest Stewardship Council certification is one way to improve the practice of forestry."

2007-10-29_150351.jpg

TreeHugger suggests that one should Choose their wood wisely, and avoid phony industry-run certification schemes.

Pick the right wood and use it wisely and there are few better, greener building materials.

 

Oct 22, 2007

Biofuels - Great Green Hope or Swindle

A raft of new studies reveal European and American multibillion dollar support for biofuels is unsustainable, environmentally destructive and much more about subsidising agri-business corporations than combating global warming.

Not only do most forms of biofuel production do little to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, growing biofuel crops uses up precious water resources, increasing the size and extent of dead zones in the oceans, boosting use of toxic pesticides and deforestation in tropical countries, such studies say.

And biofuel, powered by billions of dollars in government subsidies, will drive food prices 20-40 percent higher between now and 2020, predicts the Washington-based International Food Policy Research Institute.

"Fuel made from food is a dumb idea to put it succinctly," says Ronald Steenblik, research director at the International Institute for Sustainable Development's Global Subsidies Initiative (GSI) in Geneva, Switzerland.

Biofuel production in the U.S. and Europe is just another way of subsidising big agri-business corporations, Steenblik told IPS.

"It's (biofuel) also a distraction from dealing with the real problem of reducing greenhouse gas emissions," he asserts.

Making fuel out of corn, soy, oilseeds and sugar crops is also incredibly expensive, Steenblik and his co-authors document in two new reports on the U.S. and the European Union that are part of a series titled 'Biofuels at What Cost? Government Support for Ethanol and Biodiesel'.

Their analysis shows that by 2006 government support for biofuels had reached 11 billion dollars a year for Organisation of Economic Development and Co-operation (OECD) countries. More than 90 percent of those subsidies came from the European Union and the U.S.

These subsidies will likely climb to 13-15 billion dollars this year the report estimates. "More subsidies are coming as the biofuel industry expands," says Steenblik.

"Governments rarely phase out subsidies," laments Steenblik. "We're hoping that countries will come to their senses in the next few years."

Read more from http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/10/20/4700/

Aug 21, 2007

WHY DON'T WE RECYCLE BUILDINGS AS WELL AS WE DO SODA BOTTLES?

During the 2006 World Planners Congress in Vancouver, delegates raised an important question during a round-table talk on sustainable urbanization. They asked, if we have policies to recycle items as small as pop bottles and tin cans, why don't we have strategies to reuse or recycle items as large as buildings and even whole parts of cities?*
 
It is a vital question. It's also a good starting point for this issue of Alternatives because discussion on sustainability has largely neglected the environmental implications of decisions to demolish old buildings. .

Every brick in a building required the burning of fossil fuel in its manufacture, and every piece of lumber was cut and transported using energy. As long as the building stands, that energy is there, serving a useful purpose. Trash a building and you trash its embodied energy too. Furthermore, we burn new fuel to replace the structure. It has been estimated that the embodied energy that is lost with the demolition of a typical small urban house is equivalent to the energy saved by recycling 1.34 million aluminum cans. .