
Apr 23, 2010
Peak Phosphorus - Peakonomics 101

Apr 19, 2010
Kohler Flush with ideas and water saving products
"They're more efficient in terms of using less water and performing better than their 1.6-gallon counterparts."
Just installing a high-efficiency toilet, faucet and shower head can save an average family of four 39,000 gallons of water a year, compared with models considered the industry standard.
"When you tell somebody that 25% of the water that's consumed for indoor use is flushed down the toilet, they start to connect the dots" and see not only water savings but cost savings over time.


"The design is very contemporary and easy to clean, so it allows consumers to install a product that has beautiful design but also conserves water," Judd said.
"Thirty six states will face water shortages by 2013,"
Apr 17, 2010
Idle Livestock on Treadmill to Generate Electricity For Farms
Taylor has invented, among other contraptions, a better manure mixer and a pen that prevents cows from kicking vets during medical procedures on his farm in Northern Ireland.
Some studies suggest that cows that exercise make more milk, so Taylor plans to study the system's health benefits this fall. As a bonus, he speculates that it might cut cattle's methane problem-cows burp up to 20 percent of the world's emissions of this powerful greenhouse gas. Humans, he notes, tend to be more gassy if they lounge around. "Helping cows produce less methane while cranking out energy should get them better PR."
Sep 13, 2009
Relying on Offsets can Lead to Climate Disaster
The controversial practice of carbon offsetting, via which U.S. polluters send money overseas in exchange for promised—and often pretend—pollution reductions elsewhere, came under fire today in a new report published by Friends of the Earth.
Offsets are a centerpiece of the energy bill that passed the House of Representatives in June, and they may be included in soon-to-be-introduced legislation in the Senate. The report explains how offsets work and concludes that they are a flawed approach to combating global warming. A Dangerous Distraction: Why Offsets Are a Mistake the U.S. Cannot Afford to Make
Read full from Shirl Kennedy @ DocuTicker
Mar 12, 2009
The BIG and beautiful - Water Quality Investment Act of 2009
National water quality protection as a 'pay-as-you-go'
H.R. 1262 contains several intergovernmental mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA), including monitoring, reporting, and public notification requirements for publicly owned treatment systems. The bill also includes an additional reporting requirement for states. CBO estimates that the annual cost of complying with those mandates would likely exceed the threshold established in UMRA ($69 million for intergovernmental mandates in 2009, adjusted annually for inflation).
This legislation would authorize appropriations totaling about $18.7 billion over the next five years for EPA’s water infrastructure and grant programs. Amounts authorized to be appropriated for individual programs are shown in Table 2.

H.R. 1262 would require treatment plants to comply with a number of new requirements. Those requirements are not conditions of federal assistance, and consequently, they would be intergovernmental mandates as defined in UMRA. Specifically, the bill would require:
- Institute and utilize a monitoring program for sewer overflows, including combined sewer overflows and sanitary sewer overflows;
- Notify the public of a sewer overflow within 24 hours;
- Notify public health authorities and other affected entities, such as public water systems, if there is an imminent and substantial risk to human health due to a sewer overflow;
- Provide a report of an overflow within 24 hours to the state or to the Administrator of EPA;
- Report each sewer overflow on its monthly discharge monitoring report to EPA or the treatment plant’s state. This report must include the magnitude, cause, and mitigation efforts for the specific overflows; and
- Submit an annual report to EPA or the state on the number of overflows in a calendar year, including the details of magnitude, duration, location, potentially affected receiving waters, and mitigation efforts.
Feb 7, 2009
FACT most sustainable power is unsustainable... ouch
HARD NOSE FACT - Renewable energy needs to become a lot more renewable
This reality emerged at the Financial Times Energy Conference in London this week.
Although scientists are agreed that we must cut carbon emissions from transport and electricity generation to prevent the globe's climate becoming hotter, and more unpredictable, the most advanced "renewable" technologies are too often based upon non-renewable resources, attendees heard.
Read more here via newscientist.com (Original link from the theoildrum)
New biomass charcoal heater: A 'new era' of efficiency and sustainability
WASHINGTON, Feb. 5, 2009 Millions of homes in rural areas of Far Eastern countries are heated by charcoal burned on small, hibachi-style portable grills. Scientists in Japan are now reporting development of an improved "biomass charcoal combustion heater" that they say could open a new era in sustainable and ultra-high efficiency home heating.
Their study was published in ACS' Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, a bi-weekly journal.
In the study, Amit Suri, Masayuki Horio and colleagues note that about 67 percent of Japan is covered with forests, with that biomass the nation's most abundant renewable energy source. Wider use of biomass could tap that sustainable source of fuel and by their calculations cut annual carbon dioxide emissions by 4.46 million tons.
Using waste biomass charcoal, their heater recorded a thermal efficiency of 60-81 percent, compared to an efficiency of 46-54 percent of current biomass stoves in Turkey and the U.S.
"The charcoal combustion heater developed in the present work, with its fast startup, high efficiency, and possible automated control, would open a new era of massive but small-scale biomass utilization for a sustainable society," the authors say.
*The research in this press release is from a copyrighted publication, and stories must credit the journal by name or the American Chemical Society. News media may obtain a full text of this report ("Development of Biomass Charcoal Combustion Heater for Household Utilization") in ACS' Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research by downloading the full text article at http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/ie8006243.
Link source the oildrum HT
Feb 5, 2009
Biogas network could meet half domestic heating needs
Jan 23, 2009
Peak Oil, Gas, Coal and Uranium... Peak prosperity?
Ladies and gentlemen, did you know that when the Roman Empire finally collapsed, large parts of Europe had been deforested. Acres of forestland had been cleared for farmland and to provide firewood. Wood and food were essential, to maintain the Roman Empire. To meet their short term needs, the Romans overexploited their prime energy resource. They did not think about the consequences for later generations. So the demise of a seemingly invincible civilization was partially due to the unsustainable use of their prime energy resource. The question is, are we going to be any wiser?
What the Romans were experiencing, we would now describe as peak wood. Reaching a point of maximum production after which it enters terminal decline. We are now facing a century of at least four undesirable peaks, peak oil, peak gas, peak coal and peak uranium. Mountaineers may be proud to conquer peaks, but there is no reason whatsoever for us to be proud. We can, however, change the course of history. The technologies we need are there.
On a global level, the sun and the deserts present us with major opportunity. We know all energy resources originate from one source, one masdar, nuclear fusion from the surface of the sun. Arab traders sailed the Indian Ocean, long before Europeans ventured into these regions. The same winds Columbus used were there, generated by the sun's heat to make his historic journeys. My wife and I traveled to this beautiful city by plane, with fossil energy generated millions of years ago by that same sun. If it were up to the sun we would have no energy problems at all. Every 30 minutes the earth absorbs enough light to meet the energy needs for one year. Every 30 minutes, if only we could harvest it. To do so we need the world's deserts. Many regard deserts as a barren and hostile environment. In fact, they are a precious source of life, which we should embrace and protect for the common good.
The point is, if we don’t treat energy as a long term investment, we will end up paying much higher bills. But we mustn’t wait until solar energy plants and cross border grids are available for sustainable energy supplies. We need to invest at the local level too. Technologies for local production of sustainable energy are readily available for both electricity and local cooling. These technologies can be applied without a large infrastructure, making them more promising than existing examples. There are three examples I would like to share with you today, two designed in the Netherlands and a third a joint venture between Canadian and Spanish scientists and entrepreneurs.
The first is the green greenhouse, a new generation of greenhouses that produces not only plants and food but also clean electricity, heating and cooling. One transformed, greenhouse can provide sufficient energy for 200 homes. The green greenhouses produce biogas for electricity generation and uses the CO2 thus generated to stimulate the growth of plants. This process also produces water of drinking quality.
The second example is vacuum sewerage for toilet and kitchen disposal. The sewage is used locally for the production of biogas. The pipelines are only half the size of the normal pipelines, giving higher flexibility for construction. Both CO2 emissions and water use are reduced by 50%. No larger infrastructure is required and developing regions are presented with the opportunity to obtain much better water conditions.
The third example is the production of clean energy by a new, completely closed system of garbage gasification in small units. 99.8% of the total garbage supply is re-used or converted, producing 80% more biogas then it uses. No water is wasted during the process. On the contrary, water is one of the products.
What makes all these technologies interesting is that they contribute to the solution of the energy problem and also help in other areas. They help us reduce water scarcity and get rid of excess waste, and present new economic opportunities in developing regions. Contrary to general belief, they are no more costly than the traditional polluting production processes. In fact, they result in substantial savings. The payback time, in green greenhouses for example, is only three years.
So, ladies and gentleman, we know the technologies are there, for both global and local solutions. We need the political will and the right approach to investment for a fundamental transition toward a new energy system. We owe it to our children and to future generations. Investments in sustainable solutions make our communities healthier, our planet cleaner, our economy stronger, and our future brighter.
Let us look beyond the current financial and economic crisis and build the foundations of a sustainable future. As a result of this crisis, billions of dollars of public spending are needed to build better economies and generate economic growth. If we spend wisely in sustainable solutions, these investments will also contribute towards rescuing our planet.
Mar 31, 2008
Biochar Answer for Healthy Soil and Carbon Sequestration
Biochar is mostly inert, and is known to stay in the soil for thousands of years. It is also not subjected to the risk of being blown down in a hurricane, or cut down, or otherwise placed in a process for a more rapid return of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere.
As a sequestration technology, biochar is simple, easy, and proven. Although sequestration alone might be enough of a reason to consider biochar, the benefits of biochar in agriculture are really the reason this solution is gaining momentum quickly. The use of biochar has been shown to increase water retention, microbial activity, uptake of minerals by plants, as well as continued deposition of healthy soil. Two new organizations have emerged that highlight the multi-faceted solution of biochar.
The International Biochar Initiative (IBI) has emerged as the center for biochar research and development. The IBI:
"Provides a platform for the international exchange of information and activities in support of biochar research, development, demonstration and commercialization. It advocates biochar as a strategy to:* improve the Earth's soils;
* help mitigate the anthropogenic greenhouse effect by reducing greenhouse gas emissions and sequestering atmospheric carbon in a stable soil carbon pool; and
* improve water quality by retaining agrochemicals.The IBI also promotes:
*sustainable co-production of clean energy and other bio-based products as part of the biochar process;
* efficient biomass utilization in developing country agriculture; and
* cost-effective utilization of urban, agricultural and forest co products."
Biochar begins to answer problems surrounding biodiversity, water purity, deforestation, hunger, and poverty. As we recognize the 'services' healthy soil can provide biochar continues to gain value as a strategy to mitigate many of these issues at the same time.
Read more at treehugger
Mar 23, 2008
Microreactor can convert virtually any liquid fuel into hydrogen,
Hydrogen car problem: While hydrogen has been lauded as the "energy of the future," this is NOT a short term reality.... Hydrogen is not a great energy carrier. It has a relatively low energy density, it's difficult and dangerous to transport, and finding a way to store it in vehicles has proven difficult (ranges of only 100 miles). The refueling infrastructure is also non-existent.
Even more to the point, we haven't yet established a renewable source of energy to produce hydrogen.
Possible solution: Weighing less than one pound, the square piece of shiny steel houses an array of microchannels containing patented catalytic sites. Each microtube helps convert a continuous stream of hydrogen from fuels like gasoline, diesel, vegetable oil, biodiesel, propane, natural gas, even the glycerol byproduct from biodiesel manufacturing.
Reducing the cost of hydrogen generation: "The smaller system size, reduced catalyst volume, and more efficient process that is realized with InnovaTek's technology represents another significant step in moving the hydrogen economy from science to commercial reality," he said.
While InnovTtek's reactor can run on a variety of non-renewable hydrocarbon sources they, like the potentially revolutionary Coskata Biofuels, are expressly interested in sustainable power, even to the point of preferring biodiesel in their test runs. Innovatek also said that biodiesel just plain works better: it contains fewer impurities and reforms at lower temperatures than petrodiesel.
Taking all this into consideration, Innovatek's reactor could revolutionize the energy and transportation infrastructure of the country.
Source gas2.org
Find out more about hydrogen fuel problems and solutions at: HybridHype
Jan 25, 2008
California has taken a wrong turn in reducing greenhouse gases by allowing corn-based ethanol into vehicle gas tanks

Ethanol can be expected to add more global warming gases in the years ahead as the percentage of ethanol in gasoline climbs, according to scientists.
The analysis comes after California lifted the cap on the ethanol content of gasoline from 6 percent to 10 percent last year in preparation for a low carbon fuel standard. The strategy is aimed at cutting the carbon intensity of motor fuel by 10 percent by 2020.
"All the numbers we've seen so far go the wrong way," said Michael O'Hare, U.C. Berkeley professor of public policy. "It looks like these numbers are pretty big."
"There are things that happen that you can't see," he said.
In a January 12 memorandum to the Air Board outlining their findings, O'Hare and Farrell wrote that shifting one acre of farmland from food production to growing corn for ethanol ripples throughout world agricultural markets. It can result in forest being cut down half way around the world for planting replacement corn for food. Then the forest no longer removes carbon from the atmosphere, but instead decays and releases carbon to the air.
"The analysis suggests that indirect greenhouse gas emissions are larger than direct [ones] due to the large amounts of carbon stored in ecosystems of all sorts," according to the analysis.
The miscalculation in part stems from the so-called GREET model, which the state relied on to make judgments about the life cycle carbon emissions attributable to various fuels, the analysis notes. That model does not account for indirect land-use changes when crops are turned into fuel. As a result, for instance, it underestimates the amount of carbon emissions caused when ethanol is made out of corn grown on conservation reserve program lands--usually fragile areas prone to soil erosion--by 155 times.
Nov 16, 2007
The Key to a Environmentally Sustainable and Happy Life
Nov 5, 2007
Environmentally Preferable Purchasing team has redesigned EPA's EPP Web site!
The redesign provides clear and easy access to policy and guidance for federal purchasers; information on specific products and services; tools and calculators; publications and case studies; and related Web links. In order to ease navigation and provide the most up to date information, different parts of the EPP Web site were added, revised, moved, and archived. If you are having trouble finding an EPP resource on the redesigned site, please check the index on the EPP home page: http://www.epa.gov/epp/
Stephen Hawking on Sustainability
...We cannot remain looking inward at ourselves on a small and increasingly polluted and overcrowded planet. We need to look outward to the wider universe. This will take time and effort, but it will become easier as our technology improves. I therefore want to encourage public interest in space. I have never let my condition stop me. You only live once.
Want to know more about Stephen William Hawking
Born on 8 January 1942 (300 years after the death of Galileo) in Oxford, England. Professor Hawking has twelve honorary degrees, was awarded the CBE in 1982, and was made a Companion of Honor in 1989. He is the recipient of many awards, medals and prizes and is a Fellow of The Royal Society and a Member of the US National Academy of Sciences. Stephen Hawking - Life in the Universe
- Stephen Hawking in popular culture
- Stephen Hawking's Universe
- The Theory of Everything
- Stephen W Hawking - QA & Facts
- Stephen Hawking Trivia
- Stephen William Hawking Quick Facts
Wal-Mart Lee Scott, "Sustainability is here to stay."
High-minded words, to be sure. And they will likely rankle Wal-Mart's many detractors, for whom the words "Wal-Mart" and "sustainability," used together, are simply discordant. The doubters are not irrational. For years, Wal-Mart has been an aggressive, sometimes arrogant, leviathan, seemingly out of touch with progressive social and environmental ideas and ideals. In its single-minded pursuit for growth and dominance, it played rough -- with competitors, communities, suppliers, politicians, and anyone who got in its way, notably (or especially) activists. How can this sudden embrace of sustainability be anything other than a cynical ploy?
I'm pretty sure that it's not. In recent months, Wal-Mart has put itself out there in ways that few other companies have done. It is spreading the green gospel to its 1.3 million employees, teaching them how to live greener lives. It is inviting activists into its offices, and commanding suppliers to meet new, green goals, and parading its CEO in front of audiences and the press to talk the sustainability talk.
To the extent the cynics are right, it's that Wal-Mart's mission is to sell more stuff to more people in the pursuit of profitability and growth, an arguably unsustainable proposition. And that's a problem.
But along the way, the behemoth from Bentonville stands to move hundreds, perhaps thousands of suppliers toward a more sustainable path, and help to fuel consumer demand for things organic, nontoxic, and efficient, among other attributes. And, perhaps, engender everyday environmental habits among the citizenry in ways that even the most committed environmental activists have failed to do.
As Scott put it last week:
It's a messy affair, this sustainability thing. And Wal-Mart has made more than its share of the mess. But maybe, just maybe, that same company, in its dogged pursuit of productivity and profits, can create more than its share of the solution, too.
Oct 30, 2007
Wood Construction vs Deforestation

I don't believe that there is any contradiction here. HRH is talking about the burning of forests, particularly the rainforest, to clear land for agriculture (including palm oil plantations) or to use as fuel. There is also rainforest habitat loss due to illegal logging of exotic woods for architectural uses.
The architecture and construction we show on TreeHugger (and the wood construction we promote) is built from sustainably harvested forests, usually close to the location of construction. Our favorite woods are certified by the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) who say "In many forests around the world, logging still contributes to habitat destruction, water pollution, displacement of indigenous peoples, and violence against people who work in the forest and the wildlife that dwells there. Many consumers of wood and paper, and many forest products companies believe that the link between logging and these negative impacts can be broken, and that forests can be managed and protected at the same time. Forest Stewardship Council certification is one way to improve the practice of forestry."
TreeHugger suggests that one should Choose their wood wisely, and avoid phony industry-run certification schemes.
Pick the right wood and use it wisely and there are few better, greener building materials.
Oct 22, 2007
Biofuels - Great Green Hope or Swindle

A raft of new studies reveal European and American multibillion dollar support for biofuels is unsustainable, environmentally destructive and much more about subsidising agri-business corporations than combating global warming.
Not only do most forms of biofuel production do little to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, growing biofuel crops uses up precious water resources, increasing the size and extent of dead zones in the oceans, boosting use of toxic pesticides and deforestation in tropical countries, such studies say.
And biofuel, powered by billions of dollars in government subsidies, will drive food prices 20-40 percent higher between now and 2020, predicts the Washington-based International Food Policy Research Institute.
"Fuel made from food is a dumb idea to put it succinctly," says Ronald Steenblik, research director at the International Institute for Sustainable Development's Global Subsidies Initiative (GSI) in Geneva, Switzerland.
Biofuel production in the U.S. and Europe is just another way of subsidising big agri-business corporations, Steenblik told IPS.
"It's (biofuel) also a distraction from dealing with the real problem of reducing greenhouse gas emissions," he asserts.
Making fuel out of corn, soy, oilseeds and sugar crops is also incredibly expensive, Steenblik and his co-authors document in two new reports on the U.S. and the European Union that are part of a series titled 'Biofuels at What Cost? Government Support for Ethanol and Biodiesel'.
Their analysis shows that by 2006 government support for biofuels had reached 11 billion dollars a year for Organisation of Economic Development and Co-operation (OECD) countries. More than 90 percent of those subsidies came from the European Union and the U.S.
These subsidies will likely climb to 13-15 billion dollars this year the report estimates. "More subsidies are coming as the biofuel industry expands," says Steenblik.
"Governments rarely phase out subsidies," laments Steenblik. "We're hoping that countries will come to their senses in the next few years."
Read more from http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/10/20/4700/
Aug 21, 2007
WHY DON'T WE RECYCLE BUILDINGS AS WELL AS WE DO SODA BOTTLES?
It is a vital question. It's also a good starting point for this issue of Alternatives because discussion on sustainability has largely neglected the environmental implications of decisions to demolish old buildings. .
Every brick in a building required the burning of fossil fuel in its manufacture, and every piece of lumber was cut and transported using energy. As long as the building stands, that energy is there, serving a useful purpose. Trash a building and you trash its embodied energy too. Furthermore, we burn new fuel to replace the structure. It has been estimated that the embodied energy that is lost with the demolition of a typical small urban house is equivalent to the energy saved by recycling 1.34 million aluminum cans. .