Sep 13, 2017

The Hidden Health Hazards After Flooding

MERCOLA: Across the world, countries have experienced significant changes in weather patterns in the past decades.1 Recently, the southern U.S. coastline was again hit with category 4 hurricane winds, dumping over 50 inches of rain on Texas.2 People in Louisiana are still digging themselves out of the destruction wrought by Hurricane Katrina in 2005 and experts expect Houston may experience the same long-term consequences that have affected the residents of New Orleans.

Meteorologists are calling the flooding and storms that hit Texas "like no other."3 However, scientists did expect the storm,4 and expect even more over the coming years. In fact, the National Weather Service records Hurricane Harvey as the 25th 500-year flood to occur in the U.S. since 2010. The amount of rain that fell was in a class by itself. Only tropical storm Amelia was close, dropping 48 inches over Texas' Guadalupe River basin in 1978.

While scientists did predict a storm would hit the coast of Texas, the scale of the storm appeared to take the city by surprise. Warmer ocean temperatures created more energy for the storm to tap,5 as a hurricane converts ocean warmth into rain.6 Houston's infrastructure could not deal with the magnitude of the storm. City planners had made changes that reduced the ability of the land to drain.7 City officials also didn't expect the storm to reign as much destruction as it did.

As Hurricane Harvey was due to make landfall, Texas Governor Greg Abbott issued this statement, which was then contradicted by local officials,8 "Even if an evacuation order hasn't been issued by your local official, if you're in an area between Corpus Christi and Houston, you need to strongly consider evacuating."

While not as many were able to evacuate as would have been optimal, Houston and surrounding cities will still face decades of rebuilding to regain previous manufacturing ability and reclaim land and structures from Mother Nature. In the interim, residents are facing short-term and long-term problems in much the same way residents of other areas hard hit by hurricanes and massive amounts of water damage, such as Red Hook, New York, after Hurricane Sandy and Louisiana after Hurricane Katrina.

Houston Evacuees First Seeking Shelter and Health Care

Meteorologists first noticed the development of tropical storm Harvey on August 17, 2017.9 The storm was downgraded to a tropical depression August 19, but it then regenerated and quickly gained strength before making landfall the following week. Before rescuers picked through debris, the death count from the storm had reached 45. Nearly 1,800 fatalities were attributed to Hurricane Katrina.10 Experts believe the number of deaths in Houston won't be as high.

The majority of those who die during the immediate flooding drown.11 Just 2 feet of rapidly moving water can sweep away an SUV weighing up to 6,000 pounds.12 Many underestimate the power of water. If 6 inches of water is moving quickly, it can easily knock over an adult.

However, deaths attributed to the storm are only the first casualties to be counted. In the coming weeks, months and years it will be necessary for the cities flooded by Hurricane Harvey to address structural damages. In the immediate time period this includes finding adequate shelter for the inhabitants of the 48,700 homes that sustained flood damage.13 Vulnerable populations, such as the elderly, those who are chronically or mentally ill and the homeless, are especially at risk during a storm and in the aftermath.

Getting people out of harm's way is the first goal for rescuers. However, as people begin entering shelters, rescuers also have to address their physical needs, as well as mental concerns that result from overwhelming stress and anxiety.

Respiratory and gastrointestinal problems occur from exposure during heavy rain, as people try to salvage food and water or are exposed to airborne toxins. Others with pre-existing conditions need immediate care to avoid a life-threatening situation, such as those who have kidney disease, heart disease or diabetes.14

Floodwaters also affect wild animals that may be attempting to flee the rising water, such as snakes that are flooded out of their homes, increasing the potential for snakebites.15 floodwaters contain more than rain, debris and unexpected wild animals. Flooded sewer systems spill out, increasing the risks of infections. Following Hurricane Katrina, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported 30 cases of MRSA, a staphylococcus bacterium resistant to antibiotics, in the evacuees from New Orleans sent to Dallas.

Severe flooding also knocks over power lines, causing power outages and risks from live wires. Homeowners who use portable power generators may be at risk from breathing carbon monoxide gasses.

A review of natural disasters found that 83 percent of deaths from carbon monoxide gas could be attributed to operating portable generators for temporary power.16 Damage to the Texas community may reach or exceed $160 billion for cleanup, equal to the combined cost of Hurricanes Katrina and Sandy, and leave the fourth largest city in the U.S. uninhabitable for weeks.17

Infections After Flooding Driven by Several Factors

Once the initial days of rescue and relocation are underway, experts recognize there may be a growing concern for individuals who suffer from infections. The factors affecting risk associated with mass flooding are many. Crammed together in tight-quartered shelters, the potential for the spread of respiratory infection rises dramatically.18 Coupled with the inevitable poor sanitation from lack of a clean water supply, individuals are also at risk for contracting gastrointestinal viruses that also spread quickly.

The uncertainty of what happens next takes a significant mental toll on everyone, negatively impacting the immune system and increasing the risk of further infection and physical sickness, as well as rising numbers suffering from situational anxiety and depression.

Although the risk of infection rises, access to medical care, clean food and water and prescription medications decline. Thomas Tighe, president and chief executive of the medical nonprofit Direct Relief, believes a lot was learned from the medical care needed after Hurricane Katrina and in the 12 years since.19

In those years, medications have been stockpiled along the Texas coast and other areas prone to hurricanes. Several consumer pharmacies in Houston have stayed open despite the storm, operating on portable generators to help distribute needed medications and antibiotics.

Standing water is a prime target for mosquitoes to lay eggs and explode the local population. During the flood, containers that are often breeding grounds for mosquitoes are washed away. After the water recedes, the mosquito population recovers rapidly, and the number of diseases they carry may more than double in areas in the path of the hurricane. Following Hurricane Katrina, experts noted an increase in the spread of arboviruses commonly passed by mosquitoes, such as West Nile virus and dengue.20

Forget Tetanus as Bacterial Infection Is More Likely

Texas health officials are recommending people get a tetanus shot to protect against the disease if they should get a cut.21 These suggestions are based on the idea that contact with flood water will increase your risk of contracting the potentially life-threatening illness. However, more health experts call this an "old wives' tale … a myth."22

Michael Osterholm, Ph.D., director of the University of Minnesota's Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy, is concerned that authorities in the affected areas may recommend mass tetanus vaccinations. The CDC agrees, stating,23 "Exposure to floodwaters does not increase the risk of tetanus and tetanus immunization campaigns are not needed."

The perception that a tetanus shot is needed after a flood is widespread. Following Hurricane Andrew 25 years ago, the health care system was swamped with the demand for tetanus shots.24 The CDC and the Occupational Health and Safety Administration do recommend people involved in the cleanup process after a flood are up to date with their tetanus shots to prevent the disease if they suffer a puncture wound wading through floodwaters and removing sharp-edged debris.

The disease is also known by the common name, lockjaw. Caused by the bacterium Clostridium tetani, it produces a toxin in your body that affects your nervous system to trigger stiffening of your muscles and severe breathing difficulties that may be fatal.25 While there is treatment available, it is not uniformly effective, and the fatality rate is close to 20 percent.26 However, the rate of infection in the U.S. is extremely low, with just an average of 30 reported cases each year.

The most common ways of contracting tetanus are through puncture wounds, exposure to saliva or feces from an infected animal or person, and burns or wounds with necrotic (dead) areas.27 Symptoms of fever, diarrhea and headache start seven to 10 days after you are exposed to the bacterium.

Toxic Fumes Flood Houston After Water Damages Petrol Plants

Workers and residents in Houston are also contending with toxic fumes that have been released from local petrol refineries forced to shut down quickly due to flooding and power outages.28 Residents in the industrial fence-line communities first reported foul fumes within hours of the flooding, with some residents experiencing headaches, sore throat and itchy eyes. Though these are much the same symptoms of allergic reactions, the source of the irritant is not harmless like pollen, but has long-term effects on your health.

The smells are concentrated over East End Houston, but the chemicals may travel in the wind over longer distances in lower concentrations than the human nose can detect. Bryan Parras, an activist with the grassroots environmental justice group TEJAS, suspects the source of the chemical smells to be from numerous refineries in the Houston area as they are shutting down, causing an abnormal event.29 According to a report issued by the Environmental Integrity Project that evaluated emissions from refineries:30

"Because pollution released during upsets is almost never monitored, reports are based on estimates that can understate actual releases by an order of magnitude or more. The short-term impact of these events can also be substantial.

Upsets or sudden shutdowns can release large plumes of sulfur dioxide or toxic chemicals in just a few hours, exposing downwind communities to peak levels of pollution that are much more likely to trigger asthma attacks and other respiratory systems. The working class and minority populations typical of neighborhoods near refineries and chemical plants bear the brunt of this pollution."

Shell and Mobile oil companies have shut down their refineries in Houston and the Corpus Cristi area, among others, amounting to a nearly 1 million barrels per day loss.31 Even if the damage from flooding is controlled rapidly, the refineries won't be able to open quickly, leaving thousands out of work and driving gas prices up at the pump.

Long-Term Consequences of Flooding Not Immediately Apparent

As difficult and heartbreaking as most of the immediate effects are, the long-term devastation from mold will be experienced by home and business owners for decades. Mold is a toxic hurricane holdover. Mary Hayden of the National Center for Atmospheric Research notes that evacuees may not be able to return to their homes for up to three weeks.32 During that time, waterlogged homes will bake in the sun, giving mold ample time to grow in most of the walls and homeowners' belongings.

Mold growth after Hurricane Katrina was implicated in the deaths of four Southern University at New Orleans professors, who all worked in the same building damaged by the storm and died within a few months of each other.33

The economic loss and water damage from mold can be severe. In the Houston area, nearly 20 trillion gallons of water poured over the city as just the past month President Trump nullified requirements put in place by the previous administration to build infrastructure projects that would be able to withstand rising sea levels.34 The same infrastructure and topography that has kept the water from draining quickly creates a prolonged period for fungal growth that will be felt for decades.


Read full at:

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2017/09/13/health-hazards-after-flooding.aspx

Sep 8, 2017

Energy Department Announces up to $8.8 Million for Innovations in Algae Technology

The U.S. Department of Energy announced the selection of four additional projects from the Productivity Enhanced Algae and ToolKits funding opportunity to receive up to $8.8 million. These projects will deliver high-impact tools and techniques for increasing the productivity of algae organisms in order to reduce the costs of producing algal biofuels and bioproducts. The funding for this initiative now totals over $16 million, and supports the development of a U.S. bioeconomy that can help create jobs, spur innovation, improve quality of life, and achieve national energy security.

The selected projects include the following:

Colorado School of Mines (Golden, Colorado): The Colorado School of Mines, in partnership with Global Algae Innovations, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, and Colorado State University, will improve the productivity of robust wild algal strains using advanced directed evolution approaches in combination with high-performance, custom-built, solar simulation bioreactors.

University of California, San Diego (San Diego, California): The University of California, San Diego, will develop genetic tools, high-throughput screening methods, and breeding strategies for green algae and cyanobacteria, targeting robust production strains. The team will work with three key industrial partners: Triton Health and Nutrition, Algenesis Materials, and Global Algae Innovations.

University of Toledo (Toledo, Ohio): The University of Toledo, in partnership with Montana State University and the University of North Carolina, will cultivate microalgae in high-salinity and high-alkalinity media to achieve productivities without needing to add concentrated carbon dioxide. The team will also deliver molecular toolkits, including metabolic modeling combined with targeted genome editing.

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (Livermore, California): Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory will ecologically engineer algae to encourage growth of bacteria that efficiently remineralize dissolved organic matter to improve carbon dioxide uptake and simultaneously remove excess oxygen.

DOE's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy supports early-stage research and development of energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies that make energy more affordable and strengthen the reliability, resilience, and security of the U.S. electric grid. The Bioenergy Technologies Office contributes to EERE's mission by working with industry, academia, and national laboratory partners on a balanced portfolio of research in algal biofuels technologies.


Source:

https://energy.gov/eere/articles/energy-department-announces-88-million-innovations-algae-technology

Texas Chemical Plant Sued For Millions, First Responders Charge Gross Negligence

International Business Times: Seven first responders filed a lawsuit Thursday against a chemical company whose Houston-area facility exploded after Hurricane Harvey. The lawsuit against Arkema and three of the company's executives is seeking over $1 million in monetary relief, and alleges that the company did not adequately warn law enforcement and public health agencies about hazardous materials at the chemical plant. Those allegations come after Arkema and its lobbying group, the American Chemistry Council, lobbied to kill a federal rule designed to require companies to better coordinate and inform first responders about the toxic compounds at chemical plants. The rule would have taken effect in March.

The EPA's rule, which included a series of other safety provisions, was ultimately delayed to February 2019 by the Trump administration, with the support of top Texas Republican lawmakers — many of whom received large campaign donations from the chemical industry.

The suit filed in Harris County court asserts that after explosions at the Arkema's Crosby plant emitted a cloud of gas, company officials "repeatedly denied that the chemicals were toxic or harmful in any manner to the people, and first responders, in the community." Yet, the complaint says the fumes sickened the first responders, and charges Arkema with "gross negligence" and "malice."

"Immediately upon being exposed to the fumes from the explosion, and one by one, the police officers and first responders began to fall ill in the middle of the road," says the lawsuit, which was filed by members of local agencies including law enforcement and the fire department. "Calls for medics were made, but still no one from Arkema warned of the toxic fumes in the air. Emergency medical personnel arrived on scene, and even before exiting their vehicle, they became overcome by the fumes as well. The scene was nothing less than chaos. Police officers were doubled over vomiting, unable to breathe. Medical personnel, in their attempts to provide assistance to the officers, became overwhelmed and they too began to vomit and gasp for air."

In a statement, Arkema said its employees did "everything they could to protect the public."

"We reject any suggestion that we failed to warn of the danger of breathing the smoke from the fires at our site, or that we ever misled anyone," the company said. "To the contrary, we pleaded with the public, for their own safety, to respect the 1.5 mile evaucation zone imposed by the unified command well prior to any fire. We will vigorously defend a lawsuit that we believe is gravely mistaken." 

The American Chemistry Council, which counts Arkema as a member, said in a statement to IBT that "industry had significant concerns with many of the modifications because it was not clear that they would improve the safety and security of chemical facilities or neighboring communities."

The first responders' complaint concludes that the company did not properly store its chemicals, did not "have adequate procedures in place to protect the safety and welfare of the community in the event of a catastrophe" and failed "to provide the public and first responders accurate information on the chemicals at risk of exploding."

Company Pushed To Block Rule Requiring More Information Sharing With First Responders

The allegations about information are particularly relevant to Arkema and its lobbying group's successful effort to kill the EPA's chemical plant safety rule, just months before the disaster in Texas.

Under that rule, which was originally proposed by the Obama administration in 2013 in response to a deadly explosion at a West, Texas, fertilizer plant, owners of chemical plants would have had to increase coordination with local first responders. In particular, the rule stated companies would have to ensure that "local response organizations are aware of the regulated substances" at plants covered by EPA rules once a year.

Companies, like Arkema, operating plants covered by the laws would have also had to annually disclose to local emergency responders the amounts of the chemicals, the risks from the plant, and the "resources and capabilities at the facility to respond to an accidental release of a regulated substance."

After several years of development, the EPA finalized the rule in January in the last days of the Obama administration, with final implementation of the rule scheduled for March 14. But after apetition from a coalition of chemical and fossil fuel companies, as well as years of lobbying, EPA administrator Scott Pruitt delayed implementation of the rule to June 2017, and then delayed implementation again until February 2019.

Plant operators would have had one year to implement parts of the rule that would have improved coordination with local emergency responders. It is unclear whether the first responders who filed the lawsuit Thursday would have had improved knowledge of the toxic chemicals they allege caused them physical injury. However, enactment of the rule would have prompted companies to begin the process of complying with its first responder provisions.

"Never Heeded The Warnings" read on at:

http://www.ibtimes.com/political-capital/texas-chemical-plant-sued-millions-first-responders-charge-gross-negligence

Something Powerful in the Crosby Air

 This vivid description is included in the original petition of a lawsuit filed today againstArkema, operators of the chemical plant off the Beaumont Hwy. in Crosby — by 7 first respondersinjured after incidents there last week: "In the early morning hours of August 31, 2017, the first of several explosions occurred as a result of the abandoned chemicals heating up and igniting. Although the explosions had occurred, no one from Arkema alerted the first responders who were manning the perimeter of the arbitrary mandatory evacuation area. Immediately upon being exposed to the fumes from the explosion. and one by one. the police officers and first responders began to fall ill in the middle of the road. Calls for medics were made, but still no one from Arkema warned of the toxic fumes in the air. Emergency medical personnel arrived on scene. and even before exiting their vehicle, they became overcome by the fumes as well. The scene was nothing less than chaos. Police officers were doubled over vomiting, unable to breathe. Medical personnel, in their attempts to provide assistance to the officers became overwhelmed and they too began to vomit and gasp for air. Some of the police officers. unable to abandon their vehicles due to their weapons being present, jumped in their vehicles and drove themselves to the nearest hospital. The other officers and medical personnel were all placed in an ambulance, and were driven to the hospital." 

[Houston Chronicle; International Business Times] Still image of smoke from fire after Thursday's explosion: abc13

Sep 6, 2017

CHEMOPHOBIA...the ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety Discussion

Chemicals – The Good, Bad, and the Ugly S.B. Sigmann

Public Perception of the Chemical Enterprise The Good The Bad and the Uncertain. M.E. Jones

ACS role in Communicating chemical safety. J. Kemsley

Developing design principles for 'lesson learned' laboratory safety videos. H. Weizman

It's no accident that many journalists don't write clearly about lab safety incidents. B. Benderly

Hazmat event reporting in the media. R. Stuart

Risk Communication for the Chemist and Non-Chemist. R. Izzo

NEW Fact Sheet—EMS Workers: How Employers Can Prevent Injuries and Exposures

NEW Fact Sheet—EMS Workers: How Employers Can Prevent Injuries and Exposures
​More than 22,000 EMS workers visited emergency departments each year for work-related injuries, according to a four-year study. This new NIOSH fact sheet, co-branded with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, provides EMS employers with recommendations for preventing injuries and exposures among workers.

Sep 5, 2017

Free Webinars Will Promote Agriculture Safety Sept. 18-22

AgriSafe Network, a Susan Harwood Training Grant awardee, is sponsoring several free daily webinars in recognition of National Farm Safety and Health Week, Sept. 17-23. Topics include reducing heat illness; respiratory protection, strategies to reduce respiratory exposures, and illnesses; and ATV safety. Visit the AgriSafe Network website to register.

Top Stories OSHA Urges Recovery Workers to Stay Safe in Areas Affected by Harvey

As thousands of workers and volunteers courageously mobilize to help victims recover from the catastrophic storm damage in Texas and Louisiana, OSHA advises workers and those helping in recovery efforts to take proper safety and health precautions to avoid injury.

Following a natural disaster, recovery and cleanup workers can be exposed to many dangers, including downed power lines, carbon monoxide and electrical hazards from portable generators, confined spaces, fall and struck-by hazards from weakened and damaged trees, mold, high water levels, toxic chemical exposure, and more.

OSHA has resources to help employers keep their workers safe when hurricanes and floods strike and during cleanup and recovery operations. For more information visit OSHA.gov or the Department of Labor's Hurricane Recovery Assistance webpage.

Texas Residents Should Know the Chemicals They're Breathing After the Arkema Plant Explosion

Arkema discloses chemicals, quantities at risk in Texas
Hundreds of metric tons of highly unstable organic peroxides at imminent risk of fire
Arkema posted a list of the organic peroxides stored at Crosby, which comprises its large and diverse Luperox-brand line of polymer and resin additives. Safety data sheets for the products show that the peroxides include bis(2-ethylhexyl) peroxydicarbonate; tert-butyl 2-ethylhexaneperoxoate; 1-methyl-1-phenylethyl hydroperoxide; and 1,1-dimethylethyl ester neodecaneperoxoic acid among others.

 Read on:


Texas Residents Should Know the Chemicals They're Breathing After the Arkema Plant Explosion (Right-To-Know)

Read on:

--
NOTE: The information contained in this message and all email hosted on a provider's servers are protected by the Fourth Amendment* and the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC 2310-2321, and may also be protected by attorney-client and/or the attorney/work product privileges. It is intended only for the use of the individual named above and the privileges are not waived by virtue of this having been sent by email. If the person actually receiving this email or any other reader of the email is not the named recipient or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the named recipient, any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of the communication is strictly prohibited by law. *It is illegal for anyone (including google staff & employers, yes you) to seize and search personal emails or ANY stored emails without a warrant.
Be the change you want to see in the world.

Texas chemical plant to burn containers at risk of explosion: officials


HOUSTON (Reuters) - The operators of a Crosby, Texas, chemical factory that ran out of electricity needed to keep flammable material refrigerated will burn the remaining trailers holding the substance, officials said on Sunday. 
 
Arkema SA, the French chemicals company that runs the plant, and Harris County fire officials decided to burn the 6 remaining trailers of organic peroxides, each storing about 500,000 pounds of the materials as a "proactive measure." Three trailers already caught fire and burned. 
 
The 46-year-old plant lost power after becoming flooded by Tropical Storm Harvey. Staff tending to the materials, which are extremely flammable if not kept at low temperatures, loaded containers of the chemicals into trailers and activated backup cooling systems. They evacuated after additional safety systems and backup generators failed. 
 
The U.S. Chemical Safety Board last week said it has begun an investigation into the fires at the plant, which is about 25 miles (40 km) northeast of Houston. 
 
Arkema, fire and Texas environmental officials said in a statement the fires do not pose what it called additional risk to the area. 
 
An Arkema spokeswoman did not immediately reply to questions on how the company plans to ignite the chemicals. The Harris County Fire Marshal's office did not immediately respond to requests for comment. 
 
County officials last week evacuated residents and installed a 1.5 mile perimeter around the area, and warned the materials would likely catch fire as temperatures in the trailers rose. The chemicals are used as catalysts in the manufacture of plastic resins, polystyrene paints and other materials. 

Source:  (Reuters)

Sep 1, 2017

Holy Crap...Dow Chemical and DuPont have completed their $130-billion merger

Dow Chemical and DuPont have completed their $130-billion merger of equals, bringing together two industrial icons, if only for the next 18 months. The merger was first announced in December 2015. Shares in DowDuPont Inc. will begin trading on the New York Stock Exchange 1 September under the ticker symbol "DWDP".
​
....​
The materials science company, to be named Dow, will consist of most of Dow's operating segments, excluding agriculture and electronic materials, as well as DuPont's engineering plastics segment. The materials science company will be headquartered in Midland, Michigan. Adjusted annual sales for the materials science company are roughly $51 billion with Ebitda of $10 billion. Jim Fitterling, Dow executive v.p. and COO, is COO for materials science. 


An agriculture company, with annual sales of roughly $16 billion and Ebitda of $3 billion, contains DuPont Pioneer, DuPont Crop Protection and Dow AgroSciences. The agriculture business, which intends to incorporate DuPont into its name, will be headquartered in Wilmington, Delaware, with global business centers in Johnston, Iowa, and Indianapolis, Indiana. DuPont executive v.p. James Collins is COO for agriculture. 

The intended specialty products company, with annual sales of $12 billion and Ebitda of $3 billion, will include DuPont's protection solutions, sustainable solutions, industrial biosciences and nutrition and health as well as the health and nutrition business from FMC pending the close of that transaction. The business will also have an electronic materials segment, which combines DuPont's electronic and communications business with Dow's electronic materials business unit. The intended specialty products company will be headquartered in Wilmington. Marc Doyle, DuPont executive v.p., has been named COO for specialty products.
​​

Podcasts: Slips, Trips, and Falls: Preventing Workplace Injuries and Arthritis in the Workplace

This month's podcasts from CCOHS explain how to prevent workplace injuries that are the result of slips, trips, or falls from the same level, and feature an encore presentation of Arthritis in the Workplace.

Feature Podcast: Slips, Trips, and Falls: Preventing Workplace Injuries

Falls from slips and trips are common workplace occurrences that can result in serious injuries and disabilities. In this podcast episode, the Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety (CCOHS) explains how to prevent workplace injuries that are the result of slips, trips, or falls from the same level.

The podcast runs 5:07 minutes. Listen to the podcast now.

 

Encore Podcast: Arthritis in the Workplace

Arthritis is one of the leading causes of disability in Canada and typically occurs during the prime working years, between ages 35-50. It is predicted that more than seven million Canadian adults will be diagnosed with arthritis in the next 20 years. Learn what steps you can take to reduce the adverse effects of arthritis in the workplace.

The podcast runs 5:24 minutes. Listen to the podcast now.

 

CCOHS produces free monthly podcasts on a wide variety of topics designed to keep you current with information, tips, and insights into the health, safety, and well-being of working Canadians. You can download the audio segment to your computer or MP3 player and listen to it at your own convenience... or on the go!

See the complete list of podcast topics. Better yet, subscribe to the series on iTunes and don't miss a single episode

Health Canada Inspecting for WHMIS 2015 Compliance via @CCOHS

In 2015, the Government of Canada updated the rules for the Workplace Hazardous Materials Information System (WHMIS), a national system designed to give employers and workers information about hazardous products used in the workplace. WHMIS 2015 includes new definitions, new harmonized criteria for hazard classification, and new rules for supplier labels and safety data sheets (SDSs). Suppliers and employers importing hazardous products for use at their workplace and/or selling (including distributing) hazardous products are required to keep "specific purchasing and/or sales information" for six years after the end of the year to which they relate. Those who manufacture and sell hazardous products must keep "specific sales information".

Now, to increase WHMIS 2015 awareness, Health Canada is running a WHMIS 2015 compliance and enforcement initiative. 

From July-September 2017, select employers and suppliers in federal, provincial and territorial jurisdictions will receive a compliance promotion package, which contains information helpful to understanding the new WHMIS 2015 requirements. Some of these resources are listed below.

From October 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017 specially designated Hazardous Product Act (HPA) inspectors may visit your workplace to inspect and promote compliance. HPA inspectors may request a copy of your "specific purchasing information" and/or your "specific sales information," and up to five data sheets/labels for your hazardous products. HPA inspectors may not provide advance notice of the inspection.

If you have any questions, you can contact the CCOHS Safety Infoline or WHMIS_SIMDUT@hc-sc.gc.ca.

For WHMIS updates you can visit https://www.whmis.org/ .

 

Free WHMIS 2015 Training and Resources from CCOHS:

The Big Rewards of Health and Safety for Small Businesses to Canada’s economy

Small businesses are big contributors to Canada's economy.  They make up about 98% of all Canadian businesses, employ close to half of the private sector labour force, and contribute more than 30 percent to Canada's gross domestic product (GDP).  Statistics Canada defines a small business as one that has fewer than 100 employees.

Despite their importance to the overall economy, many small businesses face challenges establishing a health and safety program. Besides all that goes with the everyday running of a business, making sure workers are safe presents additional responsibilities. This can be particularly challenging for small business owners who might lack the specialized knowledge to identify workplace hazards and have limited resources.

Small Business Challenges

Running a business is a lot of work. Small business owners are used to working with a tight budget and lean staff. These limited resources can prevent the implementation of workplace health and safety activities.  There is often a general lack of awareness regarding legal requirements, sources for information, and training.

A 2014 Ontario Ministry of Labour report revealed that the most frequently issued orders at small business inspections were for employers failing to: post the Occupational Health and Safety Act in the workplace; take reasonable precautions to protect worker health and safety; and prepare a health and safety policy and maintain a program to implement that policy.

Legislation

Health and safety legislation across the jurisdictions in Canada is similar; however variances in the regulatory requirements do exist in some areas. Most jurisdictions require employers to establish health and safety committees or designate a health and safety representative if they employ a certain number of workers. Check the legislation in your jurisdiction for exact requirements.

Being a committee member or representative involves training in health and safety law as well as the identification, assessment and control of workplace hazards. A health and safety committee consists of employee and management representatives who meet on a regular basis to resolve health and safety issues. Usually there are equal numbers of management and non-management members, but at least half of the members must be non-management.

The role of committees and representatives is to help employers: identify and control hazards; resolve health and safety concerns and complaints; develop, implement and evaluate health and safety programs; conduct workplace inspections; investigate accidents and incidents; and resolve work refusals.

According to Canadian health and safety legislation the employer and employees are jointly responsible for health and safety. Employers must provide a safe and healthy workplace and employees must follow the practices and procedures established by the employer.

Under Canadian occupational health and safety legislation, employers have the duty to take all reasonably practicable measures in the circumstances to protect the health and safety of the worker.

The following are key regulatory requirements that the employers must meet:

  1. Prepare, review, and maintain health and safety policy.
  2. Establish a health and safety committee or ensure selection of a health and safety representative.
  3. Respond to recommendations of the health and safety committee or a representative.
  4. Provide information, instruction, and supervision to ensure employee health and safety.
  5. Provide and maintain personal protective equipment (PPE)
  6. Investigate and report accidents and illnesses.
  7. Control safety hazards and exposure to hazardous substances.
  8. Establish an occupational health service
  9. Post in the workplace copies of the Health and Safety Act and other documents as required by the legislation
  10. Meet prescribed standards.

The Benefits for Business

Business owners are required to comply with health and safety legislation. However, employee health and safety is not just about compliance with the law. An effective health and safety program can improve productivity and have a positive effect on your bottom line. Benefits of an effective health and safety program can include: reduced operating costs, protection against business interruption, improved employee relations, improved reliability and productivity, and enhanced public image and trust.

When you look at the alternative and the consequences of a serious incident, the impact on a small business can be ruinous. It is far more difficult for a small business to recover from a health and safety incident, and the relative impact is greater than on larger enterprises. In the wake of an incident, a small business may find it difficult to quickly replace key workers. Short-term interruptions of business can lead to the loss of clients and important contracts. Serious incidents could lead to the closure of a business due to the costs associated with an accident or the loss of contracts and/or customers.

A high-performing workplace health and safety program can give your business a competitive advantage. A strong safety culture means a safe and healthy workplace, with a good relationship between management and workers, fewer disruptions and delays in production and services, improved customer service, and a better bottom line.

 

Resources:

Aug 31, 2017

Fragrances and Work-Related Asthma

Fragrance ingredients used in perfumes, personal care products, cleaning products, and air fresheners can trigger asthma. Fragranced products are used in many California workplaces and have been associated with over 300 cases of work-related asthma.

A new analysis of fragrances and work-related asthmafound that perfume was the ninth most common exposure reported by all work-related asthma cases tracked by the California Department of Public Health's Work-Related Asthma Prevention Program (WRAPP). The report also found that almost a quarter of the fragrance cases were new-onset asthma, meaning that workers reported no prior history of asthma. WRAPP published the findings in the Journal of Asthma in March 2017.

To help California workers and employers address fragrances and work-related asthma, WRAPP created a new web page dedicated to this issue. The web page features relevant publications, a model fragrance-free workplace policy, and resources to find products that do not contain fragrances.

Aug 30, 2017

EPA Considers First 10 Chemicals for Risk Evaluation under Amended TSCA

(PAINT.ORG) The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is considering the first 10 chemicals undergoing risk evaluation under the amended Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). The agency will be accepting comments on the chemical/clusters through Sept. 19. ACA is seeking input from its members on comments. Based on comment, EPA will refine scoping documents published earlier this summer to publish draft problem formulations as the next step in risk evaluation. Upon publication, EPA intends to accept public comment on problem formulations, prior to proceeding to risk evaluation. EPA is offering this interim step for the first 10 risk evaluations since there was insufficient time for comment on scoping documents during the last public comment period.

EPA's scoping documents will shape evaluations of the first 10 chemicals for initial risk evaluation: asbestos; pigment violet 29; 1,4-dioxane; cyclic aliphatic bromides cluster; carbon tetrachloride; 1-bromopropane; methylene chloride; n-methylpyrrolidone; trichloroethylene; and tetrachloroethylene.

The Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act, signed into law on June 22, 2016, mandates the agency to restrict chemicals already in commerce that pose unreasonable risks to public health and the environment.

The following addresses some EPA considerations for the first risk evaluations as described in initial scoping documents, including what the agency deems associated hazards for chemicals.

First 10 Chemicals for Risk Evaluation

NMP (N-Methylpyrolidone)

In the risk evaluation for NMP, EPA expects to consider the following potentially exposed groups of human receptors: workers, occupational non-users, consumers, and bystanders associated with consumer use. EPA may identify additional potentially exposed or susceptible subpopulations that it will consider based on greater exposure.

EPA expects to consider hazards of NMP to terrestrial organisms including aquatic plants, birds and mammals exposed under acute and chronic exposure conditions. Based on reasonably available information, EPA will focus its analysis on the hazards of acute toxicity and reproductive / developmental toxicity. The plan includes analysis of environmental releases, environmental fate, environmental exposures, occupational exposures, consumer exposures and general exposures.

Methylene Chloride  
EPA will evaluate environmental exposures. EPA expects to consider three broad categories of human exposures: occupational exposures, consumer exposures, and general population exposures. Subpopulations within these exposure categories will also be considered.

EPA will evaluate for liver toxicity, neurotoxicity and irritation. In prior assessments EPA concluded that methylene chloride is likely to be carcinogenic by all routes of exposure.

HBCD (Cyclic Aliphatic Bromide Cluster)
EPA expects to consider exposures to the environment and ecological receptors. EPA expects to consider three broad categories of human exposures: occupational exposures, consumer exposures and general population exposures. Subpopulations within these exposure categories will also be considered as described herein.  EPA expects to consider worker activities where there is a potential for exposure.

EPA expects to consider hazards of HBCD to aquatic and terrestrial organisms.  Regarding non-cancer health hazards, EPA will evaluate acute toxicity, liver toxicity, thyroid toxicity, reproductive/developmental toxicity, neurotoxicity, immunotoxicity, sensitization, and irritation. Unless new information indicates potential as a carcinogen, EPA does not expect to conduct additional in-depth analysis of genotoxicity or cancer hazards in the risk evaluation of HBCD, due to prior studies failing to demonstrate a hazard.

Carbon tetrachloride
EPA expects to consider exposures to the environment and ecological receptors. EPA expects to consider three broad categories of human exposures: occupational exposures, consumer exposures, and general population exposures. Wastewater/liquid wastes, solid wastes or air emissions of carbon tetrachloride could result in potential pathways for oral, dermal or inhalation exposure to the general population. EPA will consider each media, route and pathway to estimate general population exposures.

1-Bromopropane
Associated hazards include: acute toxicity (acute lethality at high concentrations only), blood toxicity, immunotoxicity, cardiovascular toxicity, liver toxicity, kidney toxicity, reproductive toxicity, developmental toxicity, and neurotoxicity.

1,4 – Dioxane
Associated hazards include: acute toxicity, irritation, liver toxicity and kidney toxicity.

TCE
Associated hazards include: acute toxicity, liver toxicity, kidney toxicity, reproductive /developmental toxicity, neurotoxicity, immunotoxicity and sensitization.

Perchloroethylene (a.k.a. Tetrachloroethylene)
Associated hazards include: acute toxicity, neurotoxicity, kidney toxicity, liver toxicity, reproductive / developmental toxicity and irritation.

Pigment Violet 29 (PV-29)
Regarding environmental hazards, EPA expects to evaluate acute hazards to aquatic and terrestrial organisms. Existing information available from the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) does not identify environmental hazards. Regarding health hazards, EPA is obtaining existing studies from ECHA and other sources related to acute toxicity (oral/inhalation), skin and eye irritation, in vivo skin sensitization, in vitro genotoxicity, and reproductive/developmental toxicity. EPA will not conduct in-depth analysis of genotoxicity or cancer hazards in the risk evaluation of Pigment Violet 29, due to structure-activity evaluation and genotoxicity studies that do not indicate cancer.

Aug 24, 2017

Ohio EPA Sustainability Conference

EPA Conference;
October 3, 2017 Columbus, OH
This conference will show attendees how to leverage sustainable practices and resources to strengthen Ohio communities and businesses.
A large part of the conference is targeted to businesses and communities that are moving beyond basic environmental requirements into cost-effective sustainable strategies to improve environmental performance and save valuable resources. The agenda focuses on ways to become a part of the circular economy, how sustainability can improve communities, how our water resources can benefit from sustainable approaches, and the resources and incentives that can help your sustainability efforts. During the event, you will hear from business and community leaders eager to share their insight as to how they've gone above and beyond to implement sustainable practices.

Contact Information:

Keys to Environmental Compliance for Wood Furniture Manufacturers

The purpose of this manual is to summarize environmental, health, and safety requirements most relevant to wood manufacturers. It has been designed for small and medium businesses, particularly those that finish, stain, or glue wood furniture. The primary focus the National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) affecting wood furniture manufacturers. The manual also provides an overview of other air, water, wast, and occupational health and safety requirements and presents compliance options. Pollution prevention and waste reduction are encouraged, along with examples of cost savings and the environmental benefits they provide.

URL:
http://infohouse.p2ric.org/ref/12/11300.pdf

Aug 23, 2017

EPA/DHS/FEMA Radiation Exposure Limits for Responders

The general rule was always 10 REM to protect valuable property necessary for the public welfare and 25 REM for lifesaving operations. 
While there is all sorts of speculation on REM limits are the specific sources.

Protective Action Guides and Planning Guidance for Radiological Incidents (USEPA)

Protective Action Guides for Radiological Dispersal Device (RDD) and Improvised Nuclear Device (IND) Incidents (DHS/FEMA)